In
case of M/S JAY BHARAT MARUTI LTD vs.
ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND
ORS High
Court Of Delhi set-aside order passed by
the lower authorities, holding that the order should be passed by any authority
after taking into account the objections filed by the assessee as also after
giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
Issue for Consideration
In
this case assessing officer passed the order without considering the objection
filed by asseesse and without given an opportunity of being heard to him.
Facts of the Case
· AO
issued an notice dated 30.08.2011 u/s 148 to asseessee pertaining to the assessment year 2007-08.
· Asseessee
has filed objection against the same notice.
· By the order dated 28.01.2013
the respondent has rejected the objections raised by the assessee and did not give opportunity of being heard
to him pursuant to the receipt of the purported reasons behind the
proposed reopening of the assessment for
the said assessment year 2007- 08.
· Then asseesee moves for
higher authority.
Judgment of HC
· The passing of an order
dealing with the objections filed by the assessee is not an empty formality.
· The assessing officer has to
apply his mind to the objections raised and has to deal with the objections in the order.
· This has not been done in
the present case.
· On going through the order dated 28.01.2013 we find that the same has been passed without any application of mind.
· There is no discussion of the points raised by the aseessee in its objections. In fact, portions of the objections furnished by the asseessee have been copied as it is by the AO.
· On going through the order dated 28.01.2013 we find that the same has been passed without any application of mind.
· There is no discussion of the points raised by the aseessee in its objections. In fact, portions of the objections furnished by the asseessee have been copied as it is by the AO.
· Consequently, order dated
28.01.2013 is set-aside.
· The matter is remitted to
the AO to pass a fresh order after taking into account the objections filed by
the asseessee as also after giving the asseessee an opportunity of hearing.
· The order be passed by the respondent within three
weeks.
· High Court of Delhi has not
commented at all on the merits of this petition with regard to the validity of
the notice dated 30.08.2011. That issue is kept open.
CA. Mona Singhal
Partner
Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants
701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001
Mobile:- +91-9873082769
Website: www.caaga.co.in
No comments:
Post a Comment