Friday 27 December 2013

Clarification with regard to holding of shares or exercising power in a fiduciary capacity - Holding and Subsidiary relationship under Section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013.

General Circular No. 20 /2013
Dated: 27th December. 2013.

This Ministry has received a number of representations consequent upon notifying section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 which defines "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary". The stakeholders have requested this Ministry to clarify whether shares held or power exercisable by a company in a 'fiduciary capacity' will be excluded while determining if a particular company is a subsidiary of another company. The stakeholders have further pointed out that in terms of section 4(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, such shares or powers were excluded from the purview of holding-subsidiary relationship.

The matter has been examined in the Ministry and it is hereby clarified that the shares held by a company or power exercisable by it in another company in a 'fiduciary capacity' shall not be counted for the purpose of determining the holding-subsidiary relationship in terms of the provision of section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in

Tuesday 24 December 2013

Reversal of Input Tax Credit under Section 10 of the DVAT Act, 2004 in respect of Credit Note/ Debit Note related to discounts

Circular No. : 30/2013-14
Dated: 19/12/2013

 1. Under Section 10 (1) of the DVAT Act, 2004 where any purchaser has been issued with a credit note or debit note in terms of section 51 of this Act or if he returns or rejects goods purchased, as a consequence of which the tax credit claimed by him in any tax period in respect of which the purchase of goods relates, becomes short or excess, he shall compensate such short or excess by adjusting the amount of the tax credit allowed to him in the tax period in which the credit note or debit note has been issued. Such adjustment of tax credit shall be made in the context of sale/purchase made in Delhi and not in the context of interstate sale/purchase.  

2. The Credit Note issued by the Selling Dealer may relate to :

(i) Trade Discount by any name called including quantity discounts, end of year discounts, close out discounts, target discounts, bonus or incentives in the form of general credit to the purchaser’s account or supplying additional quantity of the goods dealt in by the selling dealer or providing/supplying perks, such as allowing package tours or giving gift articles, etc [Post sale perks and discounts].

(ii) Relating to goods returned or rejected by the purchaser.

(iii) Due to variation in rate or quantity in individual sale invoice;

(iv) Consideration for other facilities offered by the purchaser, such as, rent for window display, sign-boards, lease rental of premises, other establishment expenses, etc.

(v) Reimbursement of expenses incurred by purchaser on behalf of seller.

(vi) Cash Discount. (For payment made before the agreed date)

 3. Trade vs. Cash Discounts
Trade discounts are incentives for a customer to purchase a product. They may be new customer discounts, quantity discounts, repeat customer discounts, end of year discounts, close out discounts, and many more. Whatever be the type, they are designed to entice a customer to purchase now, to purchase more and to purchase this. Trade discounts are generally reflected in the credit side of the Trading Account of the dealer. Cash discounts, on the other hand, are incentives for a customer to pay the bill once they have made that purchase. They tell the customer when the bill must be paid, and communicate whether there are financial benefits (discounts) for paying before that deadline. Cash discounts are generally reflected in the credit side of the Profit & Loss Account of the dealer.

4. Trade discounts could further be classified into two types of discounts-

(a) Discounts given at the time of sale – According to the trade practice, such discounts are offered at the time of sale and VAT is charged on the resultant cost. Suppose, the cost of a good is Rs. 120/-. The seller offers a discount of Rs. 20/-. The resultant cost of the commodity now becomes Rs. 100/- and VAT @ 12.5% (say) would be Rs. 12.50 making the sale price to Rs.112.50. The seller is liable to pay Rs. 12.50 as VAT to Government and the buyer is entitled to an ITC of Rs. 12.50 on the purchase. The tax liability of the buyer would depend on the sale price at which the good is sold to consumer. In this case, no VAT adjustment is required to be made.

(b) Post sale discounts – If in the above example, the original seller offers a post-sale discount of say Rs. 10/-. Then, the cost of the good would become Rs. 90/- and VAT liability would be Rs. 11.25. But, the seller has already paid Rs. 12.50 as VAT and accounted for the same in his books of accounts. Thus, the seller is entitled to make adjustment of Rs. 1.25 (12.50-11.25) in accordance with the provision of Section 8 of DVAT Act. The sale price would now be reduced to Rs. 101.25 (112.50 -11.25). By reducing the cost price by Rs. 10/-, the seller has to issue credit note of Rs. 11.25 (10 + 1.25) to the buyer. It hardly matters whether the seller indicates the value of credit note as Rs. 11.25 or Rs. 10.00 plus Rs. 1.25 as VAT. Consequently, the buyer now becomes entitled to an ITC of Rs. 11.25 instead of Rs. 12.50 already claimed. Thus, an ITC of Rs. 1.25 (12.50-11.25) has to be reduced by the purchaser as provided in section 10 of DVAT Act.

5. The reduction in ITC by buyer is independent of reduction in output tax liability by seller. The seller may reduce the liability by revising return or making adjustment for the reduction in the output tax liability of current tax period’s return in terms of section 8. While assessing or scrutinizing the return of buyer in a particular ward, it is difficult to find out whether the pairing selling dealers have also reduced their output tax liability.
The sellers may be registered in different wards. There is no system of issue of certificate to buyer by seller stating that the output tax corresponding to credit note has been adjusted or not and neither it is desirable in VAT regime.

6. Cash discount stated at 2 (vi) issued by selling dealer is not eligible for adjustment to Output Tax in terms of provisions of Section 8 of the DVAT Act. Therefore, the Credit Notes issued on this account need not be mentioned in Annexure 2C of the return.
Similarly, the purchasing dealer need not to mention such Credit Notes in Annexure 2D of the return in Form DVAT-16.

7. Input Tax Credit has to be adjusted by the Purchasing Dealer in respect of Credit /Debit Notes related to items listed at 2(i) to 2(v). Credit note related to cash discount need not be subjected to ITC reversal. Consequently, the selling dealer will not be eligible to make adjustment of output tax on account of issue of Credit Note with respect to 2 (vi) i.e. cash discount.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in

Monday 23 December 2013

Notification  No.F.3(393)/Policy/VAT/2013/1086-1096
 Dated:19/12/2013

1. The details of programmes/functions, to be organised in the Banquet Halls, Farm  Houses, Marriage/Party Halls, Hotels, Open Ground etc., where food and/or liquor items are to be supplied/provided and cost of booking exceeds Rs. 1 Lakh per function, shall be submitted by the owner/lessee/custodian of the venue through a return in Form BE-2, annexed to this notification, at least 3 days before the start of the fortnight i.e. return for the first fortnight of a month should be filed by 3 days before first day of a month and for second fortnight it should be filed by 12th of the month. Such persons also have to enroll themselves by filing information in Form BE-1. Information of the booking/cancellation done after filing of return should be provided by revising the relevant return within a week of such cancellation.

2. Further, the application for enrolment in Form BE-1 and the fortnightly return in Form BE-2 should be filed by owner/lessee/custodian of the venue to concerned Zonal Additional Commissioner/Joint Commissioner, Department of Trade & Taxes, Vyapar Bhawan, New Delhi-110 002.

3. Any eligible person who fails to comply with the directions issued vide this Notification, shall be liable for penalty in accordance with section 86 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 along with other appropriate action as per relevant provisions of Delhi Value Added Tax Act/Rules.



4. This notification shall come into force with effect from 1st fortnight of January, 2014.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in
Procedure to be followed by Special Auditor for conduCting Special Audit under Section 58A of the DVAT Act, 2004
Circular No. F/V Audit/Spl. Audit/2012/4231-39
Dated : 19/12/2013

1. Special Auditor should always mention the name of the dealer, along with its TIN, whose accounts are to be audited and the period of Audit in the covering letter in all communications made in respect of that dealer.

2. The procurement of documents required for Audit would be the joint responsibility of the Special Auditor and the concerned Asst. Commissioner/VATO. In case of difficulty in obtaining the documents, the Special Auditor shall immediately get in touch with the concerned Additional/Joint Commissioner. If required a legal notice will be issued by the Additional/Joint Commissioner to the dealer who shows reluctance in furnishing the documents within due time.

3. Preliminary discussions between the Special Auditors and the dealer can be held either at the dealer's premise or at the Office of the Addl. Commissioner.

4. Special Auditors are permitted to visit branch offices/back up offices of the dealer for audit verification.

5. During the course of Audit, if there are any queries regarding the classification of goods, taxability or the rate of tax etc. the same may be brought to the notice of the concerned Addl. Commissioner (Zone) and the Addl. Commissioner (Audit) would get them clarified before the submission of final report.

6. All correspondences to the dealer shall also be through email and a copy of the same shall be marked to the zonal Addl. Commissioner and also to the Addl. Commissioner (VAT Audit).

7. Special Auditor shall brief the Addl. Commissioner (Zone) and the Addl. Commissioner (Audit) on any important development/detection during the audit.

8. Special Auditor shall submit a detail audit report in Form AR-l and shall cover various risk parameters of the dealer provided by the Department. In addition, the auditor shall point out any other significant adverse observations recorded during such audit. Three copies of report shall be submitted (i) Addl. Commissioner (Zone) (ii) Addl. Commissioner (Audit) and (iii) Asst. Commissioner (Ward).

9. Special Auditor may have to make a presentation on his findings before the Commissioner.

10. Special Auditor will provide necessary professional help during default assessment proceedings by the Asst. Commissioner. .

11. The Special Auditors shall submit bill in consonance with Circular dated 06.12.2013 of the Department to the concerned Zonal Addl./Joint Commissioners who would verify and forward the bill to the Addl. Commissioner (Audit).


12. The assignment of further audit work to the Special Auditor would depend on the quality and timeliness of his report.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in

Thursday 19 December 2013

Clarification With Regard to Applicability of Section 182(3) of The Companies Act, 2013
Circular no. : 19/2013
Dated : 10/12/2013

Ministry has received representations seeking clarification on disclosures to be made under section 182 of the companies Act, 2013. The same have been examined with the coming into force of the scheme relating to 'Electoral Trust Companies' in terms of section (24AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Ministry of Finance Notification No. S.O.309(E) dated 31st January, 2013 it will be expedient to explain the requirements of disclosure on part of a company of any amount or amounts contributed by it to any political parties under section 182(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.

It is hereby clarified as under;

 I. Companies contributing any amount or amounts to an Electoral Trust Company' for contributing to a political party or parties are not required to make disclosures required under section 182(3) of Companies Act 2013. It will suffice if the Accounts of the company disclose the amount released to an Electoral Trust Company.

 II. Companies contributing any amount or amounts directly to a political party or parties will be required to make the disclosures laid down in section 182(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.

 III.  Electoral Trust Companies will be required to disclose all amounts received by them from other companies/sources in their Books of Accounts and also disclose the amount or amounts contributed by them to a political party or parties as required by section 182(3) of Companies Act, 2013.


This issues with the approval of competent authority.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in

Tuesday 26 November 2013

DVAT: DISPOSAL OF REFUNDS

Notification No:F.3(378)/Policy/VAT/2013
Dated: 25.11.2013

All dealers whose refund claims are pending and their returns for the year 2009-10 onwards involve central sale/sock transfer against statutory forms are hereby directed to file information online for the pending statutory forms/declaration in Block R 10 of CST return Form 1 by 30thNovember, 2013 for the year 2009-10 and by 31st December, 2013 for the year 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 in order to help process the refund claims expeditiously. Receipt of the information so filed can be obtained from the website after filing the information.



If no such information is received by the due date, the refund claims will be processed on the basis of latest information of statutory forms available with the Department.

Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in

Clarification On VCES Scheme

Circular No.174/9/2013 – ST
Date: 21st November, 2013

In the recently held interactive sessions at Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai, which were chaired by the Hon’ble Finance Minister, the trade had raised certain queries and also expressed some apprehensions. Most of these issues have already been clarified in the aforementioned circulars/FAQs. Certain issues raised in these interactive sessions, which have not been specifically clarified hitherto or clarified adequately, are discussed and clarified as below.


S.No.
Issue raised
Clarification
1
An instance was brought to notice wherein a declaration was returned probably on the ground that it was incomplete.
As has already been directed by the Board, vide the said letter dated 22.8.2013 (para 2.4 of the letter), the designated authority shall ensure that no declaration is returned.  In all cases, declaration should be promptly received and duly acknowledged. Request for clarification should be dealt with promptly. Defects in the application, if any, should be explained to the declarant and possible assistance be provided in rectifying these defects. The effort must be to accept a declaration, as far as possible, and recover the arrears of tax.
2
An apprehension was raised that declarations are being considered for rejection under section 106 (2) of the Finance Act, 2013, even though the “tax dues” pertain to an issue or a period which is different from the issue or the period for which inquiry /investigation or audit was pending as on 1.3.2013.
Section 106(2) prescribes four conditions that would lead to rejection of declaration, namely,
 (a) an inquiry or investigation in respect of a service tax not levied or not paid or short-levied or short-paid has been initiated by way of,-
(i) search of premises under section 82 of the Finance Act,1994 ; or
 (ii) issuance of summons under section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944; or
 (iii) requiring production of accounts, documents or other evidence under the Finance Act, 1994 or the rules made there under; or
      (b) an audit has been initiated,
and such inquiry, investigation or audit was pending as on the 1st day of March, 2013.
These conditions may be construed strictly and narrowly. The concerned Commissioner may ensure that no declaration is rejected on frivolous grounds or by taking a wider interpretation of the conditions enumerated in section 106(2). If the issue or the period of inquiry, investigation or audit is identifiable from summons or any other document, the declaration in respect of such period or issue alonewill be liable for rejection under the said provision.
Examples:
(1) If an inquiry, investigation or audit, pending as  on 1.3.2013 was being carried out for the period from 2008-2011, benefit of VCES would be eligible in respect of ‘tax dues’ for the year 2012, i.e., period not covered by the inquiry, investigation or audit.
(2) If an inquiry or investigation, pending as on 1.3.2013 was in respect of a specific issue, say renting of immovable property, benefit of VCES would be eligible in respect of ‘tax dues’ concerning any other issue in respect of which no inquiry or investigation was pending as on 1.3.2013.
It is also reiterated that the designated authority, if he has reasons to believe that the declaration is covered by section 106(2), shall give a notice of intention to reject the declaration within 30 days of the date of filing of the declaration stating such reasons to reject the declaration. Commissioners should ensure that this time line is followed scrupulously.
3
Whether benefit of VCES would be available in cases where documents like balance sheet, profit and loss account etc. are called for by department in the inquiries of roving nature, while quoting authority of section 14 of the Central Excise Act in a routine manner.
The designated authority/ Commissioner concerned may take a view on merit, taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case as to whether the inquiry is of roving nature or whether the provisions of section 106 (2) are attracted in such cases.
4
Whether the benefit of the Scheme shall be admissible in respect of any amount covered under the definition of ‘taxes dues’, as defined in the Scheme, if paid by an assesses after the date of the Scheme coming into effect, (i.e., 10.5.2013), but before a declaration is filed
Yes, benefit of the Scheme would be available if such amount is declared under the Scheme subsequently, along with the remaining tax dues, if any, provided that Cenvat credit has not been utilized for payment of such amount.
Example:
A person has tax dues of Rs 10 lakh. He makes a payment of Rs 2 lakh on 15.5.2013, without making a declaration under VCES. He does not utilize Cenvat credit for paying this amount. Subsequently, he makes declaration under VCES on 1.7.2013. He may declare his tax dues as Rs 10 lakh. Rs 2 lakh paid before making the declaration will be considered as payment under VCES.
5
Whether declaration can be made in such case where service tax pertaining to the period covered by the Scheme along with interest has already been paid by the parties, before the Scheme came into effect, so as to get waiver from penalty and other proceedings?
As no “tax dues” is pending in such case, declaration cannot be filed under VCES. However, there may be a case for taking a lenient view on the issue of penalties under the provision of the Finance Act, 1994. In this regard attention is invited to section 73 (3) and section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.


Regards

CA. Mona Singhal
Partner

Arpit Gupta & Associates
Chartered Accountants

701, Nirmal Tower,
26, Barakhamba Road,
Connaught Place, Delhi-110001

Mobile:- 8130711885, 9873082769 

Website: www.caaga.co.in